Neutral News
StoriesStory arcsHow we scoreFAQGet the app
INDIA 🔗 Part of: Tech and Cybersecurity News (55) · 18 Aug 2026 · 06:07 GMT ·1 min read

Inside "Bribes.fyi": A Student-Built Platform Tracking Bribery Reports

Aryan Nishad, a Bachelor of Technology student at the Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology, launched "Bribes.fyi" on July 2, 2026.

NEUTRALITY 84 · BALANCED· 6 sources
Neutrality score measures balance across loaded language, source diversity, opinion-vs-fact framing, and context omissions.
70-100 BALANCED · 40-69 MIXED · 0-39 LEANING.

Tribuneindia

Aryan Nishad, a Bachelor of Technology student at the Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology, launched "Bribes.fyi" on July 2, 2026. The site allows citizens to report government bribery anonymously. By August 17, 2026, users submitted 616 reports from 251 cities. Police departments account for 337 of these entries, the highest count among all sectors. Approximately 38% of users reported refusing to pay bribes. The platform uses self-reported data and a simple verification checkbox. These limitations prevent the site from serving as a definitive measure of national corruption.

Context

Corruption reporting in India relied on government channels or investigative journalism. Digital crowdsourcing tools enable decentralized, user-driven data collection.

Supportive perspectives

  1. The portal serves as a centralized hub for citizens to document bribery. Since its launch on July 2, 2026, the site has gathered 616 reports from 251 cities.

  2. The system records data for specific sectors. Police departments submitted 337 reports. The Regional Transport Office (RTO) filed 88 entries.

  3. A study found that some users declined to pay. Approximately 38% of them refused to pay the demanded bribe.

  4. Users reported receiving government services after refusing to pay bribes. Citizens successfully challenged demands for illicit payments in these instances.

Critical perspectives

  1. Users confirm their experience by selecting a checkbox on the platform. This process does not independently verify the reported information.

  2. The data derives from a self-selected sample. These figures do not provide a scientific or definitive measure of corruption rates in India.

  3. The platform lacks a formal investigative mechanism. It functions as a repository for reports rather than a tool for triggering government action or legal intervention.

  4. Anonymous submissions carry a risk of false reports. The platform does not independently verify submissions to separate genuine from fabricated data.

Sources verified by Neutral

This story is built from the reporting below. Tap a source to read the original.

More in Tech and Cybersecurity News

See all 55 stories in this arc ›

Your verdict on this analysis:

Found this perspective valuable?

Get the full picture on the Neutral News app

Both sides of every story on one page, with a neutrality score on top. Follow stories as they unfold. Free on Android and iPhone.

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Neutral NewsWorld
WORLD
0
BALANCED
Neutrality score
Supportive
Critical
Tap to get the app ›