USA · 12 Aug 2026 · 08:45 GMT ·1 min read

ICE Procurement of $20 Million Electric Shock Glove Contract Draws ACLU Criticism Over Oversight

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced a $20 million contract to purchase thousands of electric shock gloves.

NEUTRALITY 84 · BALANCED· 3 sources

FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced a $20 million contract to purchase thousands of electric shock gloves. These "Generated Low Output Voltage Emitter" (G.L.O.V.E.) devices deliver electric shocks to force compliance from combative individuals. Kentucky-based Compliant Technologies LLC manufactures the gear. The devices require direct skin contact. Proponents claim the tools shorten confrontations. Jenn Rolnick Borchetta of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) stated that the public should have no confidence that ICE will use the devices appropriately.

Context

On August 10, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a notice regarding a potential no-bid contract for electric shock devices. Police departments and jails have used these tools on a limited basis.

Supportive perspectives

Supporters state the technology helps smaller or older officers manage confrontations more effectively.
The devices shorten physical altercations. This reduces the duration of high-stress encounters.
Officers must complete a mandatory training course to operate the equipment safely.
The program requires users to recertify every two years. This process verifies their ongoing competency.

Critical perspectives

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) cited the potential for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel to misuse the devices.
Critics contend that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) faces scrutiny over its use-of-force policies. They also cite a lack of institutional accountability.
The manufacturer warns that children, pregnant women, and the elderly should not use these devices because of potential safety risks.
The devices require direct skin contact to function. Some observers suggest this requirement may lead to inconsistent outcomes during real-world enforcement.